<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Means Test &amp; Creditors Claims: Enough is Enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankruptcymastery.com/means-test-creditors-claims-enough-is-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankruptcymastery.com/means-test-creditors-claims-enough-is-enough/</link>
	<description>Becoming a better bankruptcy lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Only consumer debtors take bankruptcy's means test</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcymastery.com/means-test-creditors-claims-enough-is-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Only consumer debtors take bankruptcy's means test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcymastery.com/?p=163#comment-167</guid>
		<description>[...] More on bankruptcy&#8217;s  means test [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More on bankruptcy&#8217;s  means test [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Moran, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcymastery.com/means-test-creditors-claims-enough-is-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Moran, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcymastery.com/?p=163#comment-101</guid>
		<description>The application of right to interest is most clear in the &quot;best interests of creditors&quot; test, which looks at the distribution in a hypothetical Chapter 7 case.   See 726(a)(5).

Where funding the plan is driven by income, I&#039;m extrapolating that &quot;best efforts&quot; for high income debtors would include interest, to avoid a challenge for lack of &quot;good faith&quot;.  Gotta confess I haven&#039;t researched it.

You&#039;re right that only creditors who file claims get paid, so a 100% plan is full payment to those who file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The application of right to interest is most clear in the &#8220;best interests of creditors&#8221; test, which looks at the distribution in a hypothetical Chapter 7 case.   See 726(a)(5).</p>
<p>Where funding the plan is driven by income, I&#8217;m extrapolating that &#8220;best efforts&#8221; for high income debtors would include interest, to avoid a challenge for lack of &#8220;good faith&#8221;.  Gotta confess I haven&#8217;t researched it.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right that only creditors who file claims get paid, so a 100% plan is full payment to those who file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gailyn Wink</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcymastery.com/means-test-creditors-claims-enough-is-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Gailyn Wink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcymastery.com/?p=163#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Cathy, I am confused about the application of the federal judgment rate to unsecured debt in a Chapter 13. Isn&#039;t the amount to be paid to unsecureds determined by proofs of claim filed, and isn&#039;t that amount then repaid (if a 100% plan) in full over the course of the plan? I do not see where the federal interest rate comes into the picture, please advise (code or case reference would be awesome).

And thanks for the blog, I love the insight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cathy, I am confused about the application of the federal judgment rate to unsecured debt in a Chapter 13. Isn&#8217;t the amount to be paid to unsecureds determined by proofs of claim filed, and isn&#8217;t that amount then repaid (if a 100% plan) in full over the course of the plan? I do not see where the federal interest rate comes into the picture, please advise (code or case reference would be awesome).</p>
<p>And thanks for the blog, I love the insight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

