Bankruptcy Mastery

Becoming a better bankruptcy lawyer

  • Home
  • About Cathy
  • Contact Cathy
  • Articles by Topic
    • Attorneys fees
    • Bankruptcy Practice
    • Before filing
    • Business bankruptcy
    • Cases new & significant
    • Counseling clients
    • Family Law in Bankruptcy
    • Means test
    • Opinionated
    • Real property
    • Rule 3002.1
    • Tax
  • Table of Contents
  • Start Here

When A Form 1099 Is Fiction

By Cathy Moran, Esq. Filed Under: Bankruptcy Practice

The 1099 form is so well recognized and imbued with authority that it is used by scammers  to authenticate their scheme.   But it’s really dangerous when genuine 1099’s are just plain wrong.  And according to Bill Purdy,  my go-to resource on this issue, 1099’s are often wrong.

When a non recourse loan is foreclosed, no matter what the spread between the amount of the debt and the fair market value of the property, no cancellation of debt income results. Period.  If there was no personal liability on the loan, there is not even a theoretical improvement to the borrower’s balance sheet  when the collateral is foreclosd.

Non recourse debt might be statutorily non recourse, as the purchase money non recourse provisions of California law; it may be non recourse by reason of a bankruptcy; or it may be non recourse because the collateral was acquired subject to the lien.

But neither the foreclosure servicers nor the banks are sensitive to or knowledgeable about personal liability as the trigger for cancellation of debt income.

The take-away for me was the need to dig behind each 1099 before concluding that I needed to have the client complete the IRS form to calculate whether COD income is includable in income.

 

 

 

More from my site

  • Bankruptcy Law Trumps State Protection For  Judgment LienBankruptcy Law Trumps State Protection For Judgment Lien
  • Use your authentic voice to humanize yourself and the lawUse your authentic voice to humanize yourself and the law
  • Watch Out For The Ripple Effects of BankruptcyWatch Out For The Ripple Effects of Bankruptcy
  • Today’s AI Stands To Create Work For Consumer LawyersToday’s AI Stands To Create Work For Consumer Lawyers
  • Fleshing Out Incorporation Before BankruptcyFleshing Out Incorporation Before Bankruptcy
  • Household Size Vanishes From Means Test FormHousehold Size Vanishes From Means Test Form

Filed Under: Bankruptcy Practice

Comments

  1. John D. Faucher says

    April 16, 2011 at 11:25 pm

    In most tax litigation, the taxpayer has the burden of proof – that is, the IRS is presumed to have correctly come up with the audit results being litigated, and the taxpayer has to prove it wrong in court. The biggest exception to this is a deficiency based on income unreported by the taxpayer, but reported by a third party (in other words, a 1099). In that case, the IRS has to prove the income by other means (see 26 USC 6402(d)). IRS attorneys (I was one for 10 years) have your same take-away – if the Tax Court case involves unreported income, dig behind it before concluding that the deficiency can be defended.

  2. Lendermanlaw says

    April 30, 2011 at 9:48 am

    You can challenge the 1099 to the irs and they should investigate it, problem is 1099 goes out LATER after the act the FOLLOWING YEAR and most clients give 1088 to preparer who does not know either how to challenge the 1099 or do the return correctly

    • Anonymous says

      April 30, 2011 at 5:58 pm

      IRS told a ND CA gathering of bankruptcy lawyers last year that they
      wouldn’t do anything about an erroneous 1099; their position was that it
      was the taxpayer’s problem. So you may end up treating the event as you
      think it should be treated and defending your evaluation if challenged.

      Cathy

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2025 ·Prose · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress

Theme customization by Rowboat Media LLC