Bankruptcy Mastery

Becoming a better bankruptcy lawyer

  • Home
  • About Cathy
  • Contact Cathy
  • Articles by Topic
    • Attorneys fees
    • Bankruptcy Practice
    • Before filing
    • Business bankruptcy
    • Cases new & significant
    • Counseling clients
    • Family Law in Bankruptcy
    • Means test
    • Opinionated
    • Real property
    • Rule 3002.1
    • Tax
  • Table of Contents
  • Start Here

When It Doesn’t Add Up

By Cathy Moran, Esq. Filed Under: Bankruptcy Practice


It wasn’t a week after my friend Fredrick’s presentation on due diligence for bankruptcy lawyers that the need for one of his tricks emerged.  There seems to be an ethereal convergence about such things.

The client hadn’t revealed to the young lawyer bonuses that he had received in the means test look back period. The lawyer had a paystub for every period in the six months, but still missed this income.  When pressed on the issue, the client disclosed some, but not all, of the irregular income.  (The  debtor’s failure to come totally clean is an issue for another day).  The trustee had objected and the case was stalled.

Here’s where Fredrick’s double check would have exposed the client, and the problem:  Fredrick  takes the year-to-date income on the oldest paystub in the series, adds the gross income in the next paystub, and compares that sum to the year-to-date income in the pay stub in hand.  The two numbers should match.

If the numbers don’t match, there is compensation paid between the two, apparently sequential pay stubs.  It could be a bonus, a commission check, or benefits cashed out.  But something was paid between those two payment advices if the arithemetic doesn’t check out.

The bankruptcy lawyer is then on notice that the whole story does not appear in the papers in hand.  Back to the client for more information.

I have to say that lots about the presentation on due diligence seemed appropriate for a perfect world, where time and money are freely available; that isn’t where I practice.   But this little exercise is cheap, easy and within the mathematical skills  of a lawyer!   What excuse is there not to be at least this diligent?

Image courtesy of antwerpenR.

 

More from my site

  • Marital Adjustment: Everything But The Kitchen SinkMarital Adjustment: Everything But The Kitchen Sink
  • When The Means Test Is MeaninglessWhen The Means Test Is Meaningless
  • The Means Test:  The Clunker AllowanceThe Means Test: The Clunker Allowance
  • Household Size Vanishes From Means Test FormHousehold Size Vanishes From Means Test Form
  • Means Test: Getting Business Income CorrectMeans Test: Getting Business Income Correct
  • Means Test & The Exemption See-SawMeans Test & The Exemption See-Saw

Filed Under: Bankruptcy Practice Tagged With: bankruptcy practice skills, due diligence, means test

Comments

  1. Toni Freeburg says

    March 8, 2011 at 7:11 pm

    That is why doing the year to date subtraction is usually a good way to go, just in case there was an extra pay, bonus, mileage reimbursement or similar check.

  2. carl.gregory16 says

    October 13, 2011 at 5:53 am

    Find out what you need to know in this simple yet comprehensive guide.  The cost is only $4.99, about the same as you would spend for a large coffee and donut.
    california bankruptcy

  3. helena.richardson37 says

    January 5, 2012 at 6:15 am

     If you are not satisfied with the California Guide you buy on this website, I will send you a refund- no questions asked.
    florida bankruptcy

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2023 ·Prose · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress

Theme customization by Rowboat Media LLC