Bankruptcy Mastery

Becoming a better bankruptcy lawyer

  • Home
  • About Cathy
  • Contact Cathy
  • Articles by Topic
    • Attorneys fees
    • Bankruptcy Practice
    • Before filing
    • Business bankruptcy
    • Cases new & significant
    • Counseling clients
    • Family Law in Bankruptcy
    • Means test
    • Opinionated
    • Real property
    • Rule 3002.1
    • Tax
  • Table of Contents
  • Start Here

Here Are 3 Ways To Cram Down A Car In Spite Of The Hanging Paragraph

By Cathy Moran, Esq. Filed Under: Bankruptcy Practice

There are three labeled exits from the 910 freeway.  Find one and you save your client thousands of dollars.  Miss them all and you do your client a disservice.

The infamous hanging paragraph in  §1325(a) prohibits bifurcation of a creditor’s claim secured by a vehicle into a secured claim and an unsecured claim.  Specifically:

section 506 shall not apply to a claim described in that paragraph if the creditor has a purchase money security interest securing the debt that is the subject of the claim, the debt was incurred within the 910-day period preceding the date of the filing of the petition, and the collateral for that debt consists of a motor vehicle (as defined in section 30102 of title 49) acquired for the personal use of the debtor…

Unless you can find an off-ramp, the debtor is stuck paying the contract balance on the loan.

Remember, however, that even a 910 car loan is subject to a Till interest adjustment.

The 910 Exceptions

  1. The loan isn’t purchase money  This exception to the application of 506 was designed to protect car dealers, not necessarily everyone who makes a loan secured by a car.  Look for loans that represent refinances of a car loan or the pledge of  car to secured a personal loan.  Often these refinances are done by credit unions.
  2. The vehicle is a business vehicle  Either the nature of the vehicle or the debtor’s business should tip you to a loan that may be outside the hanging paragraph.  If it’s a delivery van, Revology’s 1966 Mustang Fastback, a pickup with racks, or an SUV sufficient to haul a trailer for the debtor’s business, you may have a transaction that doesn’t involve a “motor vehicle for the personal use of the debtor.”
  3. The vehicle is driven by someone other than the debtor  Consider whether the vehicle is driven by a non debtor.  The statute speaks in terms of the debtor’s personal use, so perhaps the vehicle for the teenager or college student, or even non-debtor spouse is outside the protection of the hanging paragraph.

Keep thinking and asking questions even if the first answer is 910.

Image courtesy of Striking Images by Bo.

More from my site

  • Why A Successful Fee Application Needs A StoryWhy A Successful Fee Application Needs A Story
  • Watch Your LanguageWatch Your Language
  • What Goes Into The Liquidation AnalysisWhat Goes Into The Liquidation Analysis
  • Are You A Potted Plant?Are You A Potted Plant?
  • When Delaying The Discharge May Benefit The DebtorWhen Delaying The Discharge May Benefit The Debtor
  • Track Down All The Client’s CreditorsTrack Down All The Client’s Creditors

Filed Under: Bankruptcy Practice

Comments

  1. Dennis K. Cowan says

    May 22, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    Cathy’s comments are right on point.  It’s always a good idea to get copies of the particular loan documents to be sure how the “hanging paragraph” does – or does not – apply.  You can’t rely on the debtor just to tell you the right information.  And sometimes you can get past the 910 day problem by just waiting a short period to file the case.

    • Michael2255 says

      May 31, 2012 at 5:32 am

      I saw a Plan that gave 28% to a car creditor because the vehicle was purchase within a week of filing. Why, I asked? Because the bankruptcy mill lived in a creditor fantasy world where you had to give contract interest if a vehicle was purchased within 6 months of filing.

      I hate it when people confuse you about things you already know. Then you spend time researching what you already know and dig through statutes and case law to determine if Congress or the Supremes somehow overruled Till when you weren’t looking.

      • CathyMoran says

        May 31, 2012 at 8:58 am

        Maybe the contract rate of interest was a locally fashioned rule that was really addressed to good faith, rather than really being about the plan rate of interest.

        “Good faith” can be as powerful a tool as a judge chooses to make it, perhaps necessitating an appeal

  2. Ian Williamson says

    November 5, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    I have a car loan and I am about to declare. My ex-spouse drives the car, and its worth about 50% of the loan value. I purchased the car well before 2 and a half years, but refinanced it last year around this time. Can I “bifurcate” it? Will I be able to place the majority in unsecured?

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2023 ·Prose · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress

Theme customization by Rowboat Media LLC