Bankruptcy Mastery

Becoming a better bankruptcy lawyer

  • Home
  • About Cathy
  • Contact Cathy
  • Articles by Topic
    • Attorneys fees
    • Bankruptcy Practice
    • Before filing
    • Business bankruptcy
    • Cases new & significant
    • Counseling clients
    • Family Law in Bankruptcy
    • Means test
    • Opinionated
    • Real property
    • Rule 3002.1
    • Tax
  • Table of Contents
  • Start Here

Means Test & Creditors Claims: Enough is Enough

By Cathy Moran, Esq. Filed Under: Means test

When the means test projected disposable income number is greater than 100% of the unsecured claims, full repayment is sufficient. The means test calculation only kicks in under §1325(b) if a party objects;  no one objects to repayment of everything that is owed.

A new bankruptcy attorney brought me a B 22 form for a review:  the monthly number he’d calculated was over $2500 a month, a staggering burden should it control the Chapter 13 payments.

What had been missed was the fact that the total unsecured debt was “only” about $80,000.  With ample income, the debtors would have to pay interest on the debts, but at the federal judgment rate, not credit card rates.  So, worst case,  the debtors’ payment would be closer to $1500 than $2500, because that is all it takes to pay 100% of the debt.

In this case, it got better because we found missed deductible expenses and an understated tax obligation going forward.  The debtors will make a significant but not crippling Chapter 13 payment.

Despite our frequent grumblings, the means test is not punitive.  The debtors do not have to do any more than repay creditors in full.

Image courtesy WalknBoston

More from my site

  • What You Need To Know About Title To The HouseWhat You Need To Know About Title To The House
  • Mortgage Servicers In The CrosshairsMortgage Servicers In The Crosshairs
  • Why Choose Bankruptcy For a Judgment Proof Elder?Why Choose Bankruptcy For a Judgment Proof Elder?
  • They’re Changing the Rules On UsThey’re Changing the Rules On Us
  • The Mystery Of The Disappearing Means Test DeductionThe Mystery Of The Disappearing Means Test Deduction
  • Family, Friends And Chapter 13Family, Friends And Chapter 13

Filed Under: Means test

Comments

  1. Gailyn Wink says

    March 3, 2010 at 6:37 pm

    Cathy, I am confused about the application of the federal judgment rate to unsecured debt in a Chapter 13. Isn’t the amount to be paid to unsecureds determined by proofs of claim filed, and isn’t that amount then repaid (if a 100% plan) in full over the course of the plan? I do not see where the federal interest rate comes into the picture, please advise (code or case reference would be awesome).

    And thanks for the blog, I love the insight!

    • Cathy Moran, Esq. says

      March 4, 2010 at 9:53 am

      The application of right to interest is most clear in the “best interests of creditors” test, which looks at the distribution in a hypothetical Chapter 7 case. See 726(a)(5).

      Where funding the plan is driven by income, I’m extrapolating that “best efforts” for high income debtors would include interest, to avoid a challenge for lack of “good faith”. Gotta confess I haven’t researched it.

      You’re right that only creditors who file claims get paid, so a 100% plan is full payment to those who file.

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2023 ·Prose · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress

Theme customization by Rowboat Media LLC